Book Appointment Now
Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i7-8700K? Which one to buy
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact;; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz, and it wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
Due to the 2 extra cores, the efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even higher than the outdated Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high-end desktop CPU, the i9-9700.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact;; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz, and it wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
The efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading, thanks to the two extra cores. The i9-9700K is a high-end desktop CPU that can handle even the most demanding tasks and is great for 3D gaming.
The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card runs at up to 1.2 GHz and provides no performance advantage over previous generations. Only a few low-demand video games, such as Hearthstone, can be played with it due to its low-end GPU (see GPU web page for benchmarks).
Because the TDP is set at 95 watts, if the CPU is used in laptops, a large and bulky cooling system will be required to avoid throttling and keep clock speeds below sustained hundreds. When the CPU is overclocked, the power consumption can easily reach 200 watts and higher.
Intel Core i7-8700K 
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure and was introduced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and might execute as many as twelve threads concurrently because of Hyper-Threading. Based on Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) course. The i7-8700K is relatively simple to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.
Efficiency
Because of the two extra cores, efficiency has elevated by virtually 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core efficiency has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end mannequin, the i7-8700K is appropriate for probably the most demanding functions and video games.
Graphics
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is meant to supply larger efficiency as 50 MHz has elevated its clock price. The construct is similar to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do count on an efficiency enhancement; however, as a low-end resolution, it will, in all probability, solely show present video games easily at decreased particulars – if in any respect.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Subsequently, well-dimensioned cooling techniques ought to simply handle to take care of the created warmth. We count on elevated effectivity as a result of larger efficiency.
Intel introduced its vary of ninth Technology Core processors at its Desktop Launch Occasion 2018, together with the brand new eight-core Intel Core i7-9700K.
This would be the processor that high-end PC builders will need to purchase; however, how does it evaluate its eighth technology predecessor, the Intel Core i7-8700K?
In this article, we’ll evaluate how the 2 processors stack up in opposition to one another and see if there is a compelling cause to purchase the brand new i7-9700K over the older but very highly effective i7-8700K.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K price
The Intel Core i7-8700K launched final yr for $359 (about £270, AU$460), which put it instantly in opposition to AMD’s finest Ryzen 7 processors together with the $329 (£299, AU$469) AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-9700
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact;; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz, and it wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
The efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading, thanks to the two extra cores. The i9-9700K is a high-end desktop CPU that can handle even the most demanding tasks and is great for 3D gaming.
The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card runs at up to 1.2 GHz and provides no performance advantage over previous generations. Only a few low-demand video games, such as Hearthstone, can be played with it due to its low-end GPU (see GPU web page for benchmarks).
Because the TDP is set at 95 watts, if the CPU is used in laptops, a large and bulky cooling system will be necessary to avoid throttling and keep clock rates below sustained hundreds. When the CPU is overclocked, the power usage might easily reach 200 watts and higher.
Intel Core i7-8700K
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores released in September 2017 and is based on the Espresso Lake architecture. The processor runs at 3.7 to 4.7 GHz and can run up to twelve threads simultaneously, thanks to Hyper-Threading. The CPU is made in an enhanced 14nm (14nm++) process, according to Intel. Because of the unlocked multiplier, overclocking the i7-8700K is relatively simple.
Efficiency
Because of the two extra cores, efficiency has elevated by virtually 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core efficiency has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end mannequin, the i7-8700K is appropriate for probably the most demanding functions and video games.
Graphics
Because the clock rate of the built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU has been increased by 50 MHz, it is expected to provide greater efficiency. The design is comparable to the Intel HD Graphics 630. We anticipate a performance boost, but because it’s a low-end resolution, it’ll most likely only be capable of showing current video games in low-resolution – if at all.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Subsequently, well-dimensioned cooling techniques ought to simply handle to take care of the created warmth. We count on elevated effectivity as a result of larger efficiency.
Intel introduced its vary of ninth Technology Core processors at its Desktop Launch Occasion 2018, together with the brand new eight-core Intel Core i7-9700K.
This would be the processor that high-end PC builders will need to purchase; however, how does it evaluate its eighth technology predecessor, the Intel Core i7-8700K?
In this article, we’ll evaluate how the 2 processors stack up in opposition to one another and see if there is a compelling cause to purchase the brand new i7-9700K over the older but very highly effective i7-8700K.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K price
The Intel Core i7-8700K launched final yr for $359 (about £270, AU$460), which put it instantly in opposition to AMD’s finest Ryzen 7 processors together with the $329 (£299, AU$469) AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-9700K will value $374 (round AU$530). Within the UK, retailers have pitched it at a better £500 price ticket. The value after-tax will likely be extra,, like $399,, when you need the newer and extra highly effective i7-9700K. After all, these seeking to construct a high-end gaming PC could already be able to splurge on the perfect CPU.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: specifications
The place issues get a bit complicated because the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with two additional cores; however,, a decreased thread depends on the Intel Core i7-8700K.
So, the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with eight cores and eight threads, 12MB cache, and a TDP of 95W.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-8700K options six cores and 12 threads, 12MB cache, and a 95W TDP.
The Intel Core i7-9700K can also be rated with a base clock of three.6GHz and might enhance one in every of its processor cores all how to 4.9GHz. Comparatively, the Intel Core i7-8700K begins at a tick larger 3.7GHz base frequency. However, it can’t go practically as quickly with its most 4.7GHz enhance clock.
Nevertheless, it may very well be that overclocking the Intel Core i7-9700K place will actually achieve a lead over its predecessor. Due to its soldered built-in warmth spreader (IHS), the Intel Core i7-9700K needs to be higher at maintaining the chip cool, permitting for higher overclocks.
In idea, this purported gold-plated solder changing the thermal paste Intel has used before now will likely be a way more environmentally friendly warmth switch medium.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: must you improve?
So, must you improve from an Intel Core i7-8700K to an Intel Core i7-9700K? We cannot have the ability to offer you a definitive reply till we have correctly reviewed the brand new chip and frolicked with it, however on paper, at the least, it appears just like the Intel Core i7-9700K is a good improvement for a fairly larger worth.
It does not appear like it does something that can make the Intel Core i7-8700K out of date any time quickly, although. This may be excellent news for Intel Core i7-8700K house owners, however disappointing for others.
Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K
Blender offers us a have a look at rendering efficiency for a tile-based manufacturing 3D rendering workload. That is very totally different from how one thing like Premiere would deal with encoding, so we’d advise not attempting to extrapolate this efficiency to video functions.
The 9700K at 5.1GHz completes the GN Monkey Head render in 25 minutes, and the GN Emblem render in 28 minutes in Blender. This position is similar to the stock 2700 but with a significantly higher energy consumption of 16.5A, or around 198W. Overclocking 2700 to 4.2GHz, which is where a 2700X would settle, puts the Monkey Heads at 23 minutes and the symbol at 27 minutes. That’s when Ryzen starts to pull ahead, and it’s also when the 9900K shows its efficiency advantage over the 9700K. The 8700K does the same thing, leveraging its more threads on the 6C/12T strategy to outperform the 9700K in every test, inventory, and overclock.
Intel i7-9700K Thermal Benchmarks
The Intel i7-9700thermals K’s are now visible on the display screen. When it comes to auto settings, keep in mind that we rely heavily on the motherboard we’re using because auto voltages have the most impact on temperature. When the ASUS Maximus XI is loaded to 100% with a Blender workload, these auto settings put the 9700K at 27 degrees Celsius above ambient. It’s important to note that this is with MCE turned off, according to the boost period specification,, and consuming 90W. Throughout this look at a go, the liquid temperature is roughly 6 degrees above ambient.
The 9700K registers a mean all-core load of 54 levels over ambient at around 5GHz and 1.35V, with energy consumption of 188W and liquid thermals of roughly 10 levels above ambient. When soldered, the 9700K pattern was substantially cooler than our 9900K design, which measured 64 degrees above ambient. This heat difference isn’t due to anything other than the 9900K using a lot more energy in this test. The two outcomes aren’t directly comparable, save to state that the 9700K’s absence of hyperthreading makes it easier to keep cool under larger overclocks by consuming less energy.
However, because the energy draw for each test is different, this isn’t a true like-for-like comparison. The 8086K is also indirectly comparable in that its die is a separate measurement from the 9700K and 9900K; hence its dissipative qualities are completely different. That said, it’s still true when it comes to determining how your temps may vary from product to product for purposes of cooler selection or upgrades.
Thermally, the 9700K isn’t too difficult to cool in auto mode and can be kept rather cool with our X62 280mm cooler in overclocked mode. Overclocking over 5.1GHz and 1.35V becomes a problem with this cooler as we’re approaching the 90s for several individual core temperatures. The rest of the cores will be disabled because of the hottest cores.
Conclusion
The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism on the unveiling for being the primary “gaming” S-class i7 in the current historical past to drop hyperthreading. The transfer was accompanied by a rise in bodily core depend to 8C however adopted the earlier transfer from 4C/8T to 6C/12T and thus felt like an odd middle-step that had forgotten the teachings realized by the 8700K. The choice left fans feeling ripped-off; relatively than a transparent enhancement within the product class, Intel had made a lateral step.
Now that we’ve examined it, we can see that benchmarking positions the 9700K as superior in gaming duties, largely due to frequency, to the previous 8700K. This doesn’t stay true in each case, like in Blender workloads, the place the extra threads of the 8700K show advantageous. The value improvement of the 9700K over the 8700K also feels off-putting, so the positive factors the 9700K makes in gaming are misplaced when contemplating the value improvement. It’d be extra tenable; however, a rise to $400 to $430 is unpalatable within the face of Intel’s equally performing i7-8700K at cheaper costs.
The transfer didn’t really feel productive for Intel. The 9700K is ok. It’s not a foul product, it does nicely in testing (total), and each wins and loses some checks, as any product would do. The oddity is simply that it’s shedding checks in opposition to its predecessor, even when these are easy checks of worth, not essentially efficiency. This was true for the likes of the RTX 2080 as nicely, as an illustration, the place efficiency was fantastic. However, the worth was a transparent regression from the earlier technology. We really feel equally concerning the 9700K. We have to see the value come right down to round the place the 8700K is – around $350 – to feel snug with the 9700K essentially. Even then, it appears like an odd lateral transfer from the 8700
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz. It wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
Due to the 2 extra cores, the efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even higher than the outdated Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high-end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding functions and excellent for 3D gaming.
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at as much as 1.2 GHz and affords no benefit compared to earlier generations. As it’s a very low-end GPU, just some low-demanding video games like Hearthstone may be performed with it (see GPU web page for benchmarks).
Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is utilized in laptops, a giant and chunky cooling system is required to keep away from throttling and decrease clock speeds below sustained hundreds. When overclocking the CPU, the ability consumption can simply rise as much as 200 Watt and better.
Intel Core i7-8700K
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure and was introduced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and might execute twelve threads concurrently because of Hyper-Threading. Based on Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) course. The i7-8700K is relatively simple to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.
Efficiency
Because of the two extra cores, efficiency has elevated by virtually 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core efficiency has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end mannequin, the i7-8700K is appropriate for probably the most demanding functions and video games.
Graphics
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is meant to supply larger efficiency as 50 MHz has elevated its clock price. The construct is similar to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do count on an efficiency enhancement; however, as a low-end resolution, it will in all probability solely show present video games easily at decreased particulars – if in any respect.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Subsequently, well-dimensioned cooling techniques ought to simply handle to take care of the created warmth. We count on elevated effectivity as a result of larger efficiency.
Intel introduced its vary of ninth Technology Core processors at its Desktop Launch Occasion 2018, together with the brand new eight-core Intel Core i7-9700K.
This would be the processor that high-end PC builders will need to purchase; however, how does it evaluate its eighth technology predecessor, the Intel Core i7-8700K?
In this article, we’ll evaluate how the 2 processors stack up in opposition to one another and see if there is a compelling cause to purchase the brand new i7-9700K over the older but very highly effective i7-8700K.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K price
The Intel Core i7-8700K launched final yr for $359 (about £270, AU$460), which put it instantly in opposition to AMD’s finest Ryzen 7 processors together with the $329 (£299, AU$469) AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-9700K will value $374 (round AU$530). Within the UK, retailers have pitched it at a better £500 price ticket. The value after-tax will likely be extra, like $399, when you need the newer and extra highly effective, i7-9700K. After all, these seeking to construct a high-end gaming PC could already be able to splurge on the perfect CPU.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: specifications
The place issues get a bit complicated because the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with two additional cores; however, a decreased thread depends on the Intel Core i7-8700K.
So, the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with eight cores and eight threads, 12MB cache, and a TDP of 95W.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-8700K options six cores and 12 threads, 12MB cache, and a 95W TDP.
The Intel Core i7-9700K can also be rated with a base clock of three.6GHz and might enhance one in every of its processor cores all how to 4.9GHz. Comparatively, the Intel Core i7-8700K begins at a tick larger 3.7GHz base frequency. However, it can’t go practically as quickly with its most 4.7GHz enhance clock.
Nevertheless, it may very well be that overclocking the Intel Core i7-9700K place will actually achieve a lead over its predecessor. Due to its soldered built-in warmth spreader (IHS), the Intel Core i7-9700K needs to be higher at maintaining the chip cool, permitting for higher overclocks.
In idea, this purported gold-plated solder changing the thermal paste Intel has used before now will likely be a way more environmentally friendly warmth switch medium.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: must you improve?
So, must you improve from an Intel Core i7-8700K to an Intel Core i7-9700K? We cannot have the ability to offer you a definitive reply till we have correctly reviewed the brand new chip and frolicked with it, however on paper, at the least, it appears just like the Intel Core i7-9700K is a good improvement for a fairly larger worth.
It does not appear like it does something that can make the Intel Core i7-8700K out of date any time quickly, although. This may be excellent news for Intel Core i7-8700K house owners, however disappointing for others.
Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K
Blender offers us a have a look at rendering efficiency for a tile-based manufacturing 3D rendering workload. That is very different from how Premiere would deal with encoding, so we’d advise not attempting to extrapolate this efficiency to video functions.
For Blender, the 9700K at 5.1GHz finally finishes finishing the GN Monkey Head render in 25 minutes, or the GN Emblem render in 28 minutes. This location is around the inventory 2700 is, however, with considerably larger energy consumption at 16.5A, or about 198W. Overclocking 2700 to 4.2GHz, just like the place a 2700X would land, places it at 23 minutes for the Monkey Heads and 27 minutes for the emblem. That is where Ryzen begins to tug forward and can also be the place the 9900K exhibits its efficiency benefit over the 9700K. The identical is true for the 8700K, which leverages its additional threads on the 6C/12T strategy to steer the 9700K in every take a look at, inventory, and overclocked.
Intel i7-9700K Thermal Benchmarks
Thermals on the Intel i7-9700K are on the display screen now. For auto settings, remember that we closely depend upon the motherboard used because auto voltages most instantly impact the temperature. For the ASUS Maximus XI, these auto settings put the 9700K at 27 levels Celsius over ambient when loaded to 100% with a Blender workload. Understand that that is with MCE disabled, so it’s following the enhanced period specification and sticking to the ability consumption of 90W. Liquid temperature is at around 6 levels over ambient throughout this take a look at go.
Going to about 5GHz and 1.35V, the 9700K measures a mean all-core load of 54 levels over ambient, with energy consumption at 188W and liquid thermals at about 10 levels over ambient. These locations, the 9700K as noticeably cooler than our 9900K pattern when soldered, which measured at 64 levels over ambient. This thermal delta isn’t for every other cause than the 9900K drawing considerably extra energy on this takes a look at. The 2 outcomes usually are not instantly comparable, aside from saying that the 9700K’s lack of hyperthreading does make it simpler to maintain cool below heavier overclocks by drawing much less energy. This isn’t like-for-like comparability, although, provided that energy draw is totally different for each takes a look at. The 8086K can also be indirectly comparable in that its die is a distinct measurement, and so its dissipative properties are totally different than the 9700K and 9900K. That stated it’s nonetheless correct simply about evaluating how your temperatures may fluctuate from product to product for functions of cooler choice or upgrades.
Thermally, the 9700K isn’t that onerous to chill below auto situations and maybe saved fairly cool with our X62 280mm cooler below overclocked situations. It does turn into a problem to overclock past 5.1GHz and 1.35V with this cooler, as we’re coming into the 90s for some particular person core temperatures. These hottest cores will prohibit the remainder of the cores.
Conclusion
The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism on the unveiling for being the primary “gaming” S-class i7 in the current historical past to drop hyperthreading. The transfer was accompanied by a rise in bodily core depend to 8C however adopted the earlier transfer from 4C/8T to 6C/12T and thus felt like an odd middle-step that had forgotten the teachings realized by the 8700K. The choice left fans feeling ripped-off; relatively than a transparent enhancement within the product class, Intel had made a lateral step.
Now that we’ve examined it, we can see that benchmarking positions the 9700K as superior in gaming duties, largely due to frequency, to the previous 8700K. This doesn’t stay true in each case, like in Blender workloads, the place the extra threads of the 8700K show advantageous. The value improvement of the 9700K over the 8700K also feels off-putting, so the positive factors the 9700K makes in gaming are misplaced when contemplating the value improvement. It’d be extra tenable; however, a rise to $400 to $430 is unpalatable within the face of Intel’s equally performing i7-8700K at cheaper costs.
The transfer didn’t really feel productive for Intel. The 9700K is ok. It’s not a foul product, it does nicely in testing (total), and each wins and loses some checks, as any product would do. The oddity is simply that it’s shedding checks in opposition to its predecessor, even when these are easy checks of worth, not essentially efficiency. This was true for the likes of the RTX 2080 as nicely, as an illustration, the place efficiency was fantastic. However, the worth was a transparent regression from the earlier technology. We really feel equally concerning the 9700K. We have to see the value come right down to round the place the 8700K is – around $350 – to feel snug with the 9700K essentially. Even then, it appears like an odd lateral transfer from the 8700
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz. It wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
Due to the 2 extra cores, the efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even higher than the outdated Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high-end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding functions and excellent for 3D gaming.
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at as much as 1.2 GHz and affords no benefit compared to earlier generations. As it’s a very low-end GPU, just some low-demanding video games like Hearthstone may be performed with it (see GPU web page for benchmarks).
Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is utilized in laptops, a giant and chunky cooling system is required to keep away from throttling and decrease clock speeds below sustained hundreds. When overclocking the CPU, the ability consumption can simply rise as much as 200 Watt and better.
Intel Core i7-8700K
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure and was introduced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and might execute twelve threads concurrently because of Hyper-Threading. Based on Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) course. The i7-8700K is relatively simple to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.
Efficiency
Because of the two extra cores, efficiency has elevated by virtually 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core efficiency has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end mannequin, the i7-8700K is appropriate for probably the most demanding functions and video games.
Graphics
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is meant to supply larger efficiency as 50 MHz has elevated its clock price. The construct is similar to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do count on an efficiency enhancement; however, as a low-end resolution, it will in all probability solely show present video games easily at decreased particulars – if in any respect.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Subsequently, well-dimensioned cooling techniques ought to simply handle to take care of the created warmth. We count on elevated effectivity as a result of larger efficiency.
Intel introduced its vary of ninth Technology Core processors at its Desktop Launch Occasion 2018, together with the brand new eight-core Intel Core i7-9700K.
This would be the processor that high-end PC builders will need to purchase; however, how does it evaluate its eighth technology predecessor, the Intel Core i7-8700K?
In this article, we’ll evaluate how the 2 processors stack up in opposition to one another and see if there is a compelling cause to purchase the brand new i7-9700K over the older but very highly effective i7-8700K.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K price
The Intel Core i7-8700K launched final yr for $359 (about £270, AU$460), which put it instantly in opposition to AMD’s finest Ryzen 7 processors together with the $329 (£299, AU$469) AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-9700K will value $374 (round AU$530). Within the UK, retailers have pitched it at a better £500 price ticket. The value after-tax will likely be extra, like $399, when you need the newer and extra highly effective i7-9700K. After all, these seeking to construct a high-end gaming PC could already be able to splurge on the perfect CPU.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: specifications
The place issues get a bit complicated because the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with two additional cores; however, a decreased thread depends on the Intel Core i7-8700K.
So, the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with eight cores and eight threads, 12MB cache, and a TDP of 95W.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-8700K options six cores and 12 threads, 12MB cache, and a 95W TDP.
The Intel Core i7-9700K can also be rated with a base clock of three.6GHz and might enhance one in every of its processor cores all how to 4.9GHz. Comparatively, the Intel Core i7-8700K begins at a tick larger 3.7GHz base frequency. However, it can’t go practically as quickly with its most 4.7GHz enhance clock.
Nevertheless, it may very well be that overclocking the Intel Core i7-9700K place will actually achieve a lead over its predecessor. Due to its soldered built-in warmth spreader (IHS), the Intel Core i7-9700K needs to be higher at maintaining the chip cool, permitting for higher overclocks.
In idea, this purported gold-plated solder changing the thermal paste Intel has used before now will likely be a way more environmentally friendly warmth switch medium.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: must you improve?
So, must you improve from an Intel Core i7-8700K to an Intel Core i7-9700K? We cannot have the ability to offer you a definitive reply till we have correctly reviewed the brand new chip and frolicked with it, however on paper, at the least, it appears just like the Intel Core i7-9700K is a good improvement for a fairly larger worth.
It does not appear like it does something that can make the Intel Core i7-8700K out of date any time quickly, although. This may be excellent news for Intel Core i7-8700K house owners, however disappointing for others.
Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K
Blender offers us a have a look at rendering efficiency for a tile-based manufacturing 3D rendering workload. That is very totally different from how one thing like Premiere would deal with encoding, so we’d advise not attempting to extrapolate this efficiency to video functions.
For Blender, the 9700K at 5.1GHz finally finishes finishing the GN Monkey Head render in 25 minutes, or the GN Emblem render in 28 minutes. This location is around the inventory 2700 is, however, with considerably larger energy consumption at 16.5A, or about 198W. Overclocking 2700 to 4.2GHz, just like the place a 2700X would land, places it at 23 minutes for the Monkey Heads and 27 minutes for the emblem. That is where Ryzen begins to tug forward and can also be the place the 9900K exhibits its efficiency benefit over the 9700K. The identical is true for the 8700K, which leverages its additional threads on the 6C/12T strategy to steer the 9700K in every take a look at, inventory, and overclocked.
Intel i7-9700K Thermal Benchmarks
Thermals on the Intel i7-9700K are on the display screen now. For auto settings, remember that we closely depend upon the motherboard used because auto voltages most instantly impact the temperature. For the ASUS Maximus XI, these auto settings put the 9700K at 27 levels Celsius over ambient when loaded to 100% with a Blender workload. Understand that that is with MCE disabled, so it’s following the enhanced period specification and sticking to the ability consumption of 90W. Liquid temperature is at around 6 levels over ambient throughout this take a look at go.
Going to about 5GHz and 1.35V, the 9700K measures a mean all-core load of 54 levels over ambient, with energy consumption at 188W and liquid thermals at about 10 levels over ambient. These locations, the 9700K as noticeably cooler than our 9900K pattern when soldered, which measured at 64 levels over ambient. This thermal delta isn’t for every other cause than the 9900K drawing considerably extra energy on this takes a look at. The 2 outcomes usually are not instantly comparable, aside from saying that the 9700K’s lack of hyperthreading does make it simpler to maintain cool below heavier overclocks by drawing much less energy. This isn’t like-for-like comparability, although, provided that energy draw is totally different for each takes a look at. The 8086K can also be indirectly comparable in that its die is a distinct measurement, and so its dissipative properties are totally different than the 9700K and 9900K. That stated it’s nonetheless correct simply about evaluating how your temperatures may fluctuate from product to product for functions of cooler choice or upgrades.
Thermally, the 9700K isn’t that onerous to chill below auto situations and maybe saved fairly cool with our X62 280mm cooler below overclocked situations. It does turn into a problem to overclock past 5.1GHz and 1.35V with this cooler, as we’re coming into the 90s for some particular person core temperatures. These hottest cores will prohibit the remainder of the cores.
Conclusion – Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism on the unveiling for being the primary “gaming” S-class i7 in the current historical past to drop hyperthreading. The transfer was accompanied by a rise in bodily core depend to 8C however adopted the earlier transfer from 4C/8T to 6C/12T and thus felt like an odd middle-step that had forgotten the teachings realized by the 8700K. The choice left fans feeling ripped-off; relatively than a transparent enhancement within the product class, Intel had made a lateral step.
Now that we’ve examined it, we can see that benchmarking positions the 9700K as superior in gaming duties, largely due to frequency, to the previous 8700K. This doesn’t stay true in each case, like in Blender workloads, the place the extra threads of the 8700K show advantageous. The value improvement of the 9700K over the 8700K also feels off-putting, so the positive factors the 9700K makes in gaming are misplaced when contemplating the value improvement. It’d be extra tenable; however, a rise to $400 to $430 is unpalatable within the face of Intel’s equally performing i7-8700K at cheaper costs.
The transfer didn’t really feel productive for Intel. The 9700K is ok. It’s not a foul product, it does nicely in testing (total), and each wins and loses some checks, as any product would do. The oddity is simply that it’s shedding checks in opposition to its predecessor, even when these are easy checks of worth, not essentially efficiency. This was true for the likes of the RTX 2080 as nicely, as an illustration, the place efficiency was fantastic. However, the worth was a transparent regression from the earlier technology. We really feel equally concerning the 9700K. We have to see the value come right down to round the place the 8700K is – around $350 – to feel snug with the 9700K essentially. Even then, it appears like an odd lateral transfer from the 8700
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high-end desktop processor primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure. It affords an open multiplicator for straightforward overclocking and integrates eight cores (no Hyperthreading due to this fact; additionally, eight threads) clocked at 3.6 – 4.9 GHz. It wants a brand new Z390 primarily based mainboard.
Due to the 2 extra cores, the efficiency in multi-threaded functions is even higher than the outdated Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high-end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding functions and excellent for 3D gaming.
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at as much as 1.2 GHz and affords no benefit compared to earlier generations. As it’s a very low-end GPU, just some low-demanding video games like Hearthstone may be performed with it (see GPU web page for benchmarks).
Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is utilized in laptops, a giant and chunky cooling system is required to keep away from throttling and decrease clock speeds below sustained hundreds. When overclocking the CPU, the ability consumption can simply rise as much as 200 Watt and better.
Intel Core i7-8700K
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores primarily based on the Espresso Lake structure and was introduced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and might execute twelve threads concurrently because of Hyper-Threading. Based on Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) course. The i7-8700K is relatively simple to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.
Efficiency
Because of the two extra cores, efficiency has elevated by virtually 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core efficiency has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end mannequin, the i7-8700K is appropriate for probably the most demanding functions and video games.
Graphics
The built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is meant to supply larger efficiency as 50 MHz has elevated its clock price. The construct is similar to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do count on an efficiency enhancement; however, as a low-end resolution, it will in all probability solely show present video games easily at decreased particulars – if in any respect.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Subsequently, well-dimensioned cooling techniques ought to simply handle to take care of the created warmth. We count on elevated effectivity as a result of larger efficiency.
Intel introduced its vary of ninth Technology Core processors at its Desktop Launch Occasion 2018, together with the brand new eight-core Intel Core i7-9700K.
This would be the processor that high-end PC builders will need to purchase; however, how does it evaluate its eighth technology predecessor, the Intel Core i7-8700K?
In this article, we’ll evaluate how the 2 processors stack up in opposition to one another and see if there is a compelling cause to purchase the brand new i7-9700K over the older but very highly effective i7-8700K.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K price
The Intel Core i7-8700K launched final yr for $359 (about £270, AU$460), which put it instantly in opposition to AMD’s finest Ryzen 7 processors together with the $329 (£299, AU$469) AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-9700K will value $374 (round AU$530). Within the UK, retailers have pitched it at a better £500 price ticket. The value after-tax will likely be extra, like $399, when you need the newer and extra highly effective i7-9700K. After all, these seeking to construct a high-end gaming PC could already be able to splurge on the perfect CPU.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: specifications
The place issues get a bit complicated because the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with two additional cores; however, a decreased thread depends on the Intel Core i7-8700K.
So, the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with eight cores and eight threads, 12MB cache, and a TDP of 95W.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-8700K options six cores and 12 threads, 12MB cache, and a 95W TDP.
The Intel Core i7-9700K can also be rated with a base clock of three.6GHz and might enhance one in every of its processor cores all how to 4.9GHz. Comparatively, the Intel Core i7-8700K begins at a tick larger 3.7GHz base frequency. However, it can’t go practically as quickly with its most 4.7GHz enhance clock.
Nevertheless, it may very well be that overclocking the Intel Core i7-9700K place will actually achieve a lead over its predecessor. Due to its soldered built-in warmth spreader (IHS), the Intel Core i7-9700K needs to be higher at maintaining the chip cool, permitting for higher overclocks.
In idea, this purported gold-plated solder changing the thermal paste Intel has used before now will likely be a way more environmentally friendly warmth switch medium.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: must you improve?
So, must you improve from an Intel Core i7-8700K to an Intel Core i7-9700K? We cannot have the ability to offer you a definitive reply till we have correctly reviewed the brand new chip and frolicked with it, however on paper, at the least, it appears just like the Intel Core i7-9700K is a good improvement for a fairly larger worth.
It does not appear like it does something that can make the Intel Core i7-8700K out of date any time quickly, although. This may be excellent news for Intel Core i7-8700K house owners, however disappointing for others.
Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K
Blender offers us a have a look at rendering efficiency for a tile-based manufacturing 3D rendering workload. That is very totally different from how one thing like Premiere would deal with encoding, so we’d advise not attempting to extrapolate this efficiency to video functions.
For Blender, the 9700K at 5.1GHz finally finishes finishing the GN Monkey Head render in 25 minutes, or the GN Emblem render in 28 minutes. This location is around the inventory 2700 is, however, with considerably larger energy consumption at 16.5A, or about 198W. Overclocking 2700 to 4.2GHz, just like the place a 2700X would land, places it at 23 minutes for the Monkey Heads and 27 minutes for the emblem. That is where Ryzen begins to tug forward and can also be the place the 9900K exhibits its efficiency benefit over the 9700K. The identical is true for the 8700K, which leverages its additional threads on the 6C/12T strategy to steer the 9700K in every take a look at, inventory, and overclocked.
Intel i7-9700K Thermal Benchmarks
Thermals on the Intel i7-9700K are on the display screen now. For auto settings, remember that we closely depend upon the motherboard used because auto voltages most instantly impact the temperature. For the ASUS Maximus XI, these auto settings put the 9700K at 27 levels Celsius over ambient when loaded to 100% with a Blender workload. Understand that that is with MCE disabled, so it’s following the enhanced period specification and sticking to the ability consumption of 90W. Liquid temperature is at around 6 levels over ambient throughout this take a look at go.
Going to about 5GHz and 1.35V, the 9700K measures a mean all-core load of 54 levels over ambient, with energy consumption at 188W and liquid thermals at about 10 levels over ambient. These locations, the 9700K as noticeably cooler than our 9900K pattern when soldered, which measured at 64 levels over ambient. This thermal delta isn’t for every other cause than the 9900K drawing considerably extra energy on this takes a look at. The 2 outcomes usually are not instantly comparable, aside from saying that the 9700K’s lack of hyperthreading does make it simpler to maintain cool below heavier overclocks by drawing much less energy. This isn’t like-for-like comparability, although, provided that energy draw is totally different for each takes a look at. The 8086K can also be indirectly comparable in that its die is a distinct measurement, and so its dissipative properties are totally different than the 9700K and 9900K. That stated it’s nonetheless correct simply concerning evaluating how your temperatures may fluctuate from product to product for functions of cooler choice or upgrades.
Thermally, the 9700K isn’t that onerous to chill below auto situations and maybe saved fairly cool with our X62 280mm cooler below overclocked situations. It does turn into a problem to overclock past 5.1GHz and 1.35V with this cooler, as we’re coming into the 90s for some particular person core temperatures. These hottest cores will prohibit the remainder of the cores.
Conclusion
The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism on the unveiling for being the primary “gaming” S-class i7 in the current historical past to drop hyperthreading. The transfer was accompanied by a rise in bodily core depend to 8C however adopted the earlier transfer from 4C/8T to 6C/12T and thus felt like an odd middle-step that had forgotten the teachings realized by the 8700K. The choice left fans feeling ripped-off; relatively than a transparent enhancement within the product class, Intel had made a lateral step.
Now that we’ve examined it, we can see that benchmarking positions the 9700K as superior in gaming duties, largely due to frequency, to the previous 8700K. This doesn’t stay true in each case, like in Blender workloads, the place the extra threads of the 8700K show advantageous. The value improvement of the 9700K over the 8700K also feels off-putting, so the positive factors the 9700K makes in gaming are misplaced when contemplating the value improvement. It’d be extra tenable; however, a rise to $400 to $430 is unpalatable within the face of Intel’s equally performing i7-8700K at cheaper costs.
The transfer didn’t really feel productive for Intel. The 9700K is ok. It’s not a foul product, it does nicely in testing (total), and each wins and loses some checks, as any product would do. The oddity is simply that it’s shedding checks in opposition to its predecessor, even when these are easy checks of worth, not essentially efficiency. This was true for the likes of the RTX 2080 as nicely, as an illustration, the place efficiency was fantastic. However, the worth was a transparent regression from the earlier technology. We really feel equally concerning the 9700K.
We have to see the value come right down to round the place the 8700K is – around $350 – to feel snug with the 9700K essentially. Even then, it appears like an odd lateral transfer from the 8700K earlier than it. Will value $374 (round AU$530). Within the UK, retailers have pitched it at a better £500 price ticket. The value after-tax will likely be extra, like $399, when you need the newer and extra highly effective i7-9700K. After all, these seeking to construct a high-end gaming PC could already be able to splurge on the perfect CPU.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: specifications
The place issues get a bit complicated because the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with two additional cores; however, a decreased thread depends on the Intel Core i7-8700K.
So, the Intel Core i7-9700K comes with eight cores and eight threads, 12MB cache, and a TDP of 95W.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i7-8700K options six cores and 12 threads, 12MB cache, and a 95W TDP.
The Intel Core i7-9700K can also be rated with a base clock of three.6GHz and might enhance one in every of its processor cores all how to 4.9GHz. Comparatively, the Intel Core i7-8700K begins at a tick larger 3.7GHz base frequency. However, it can’t go practically as quickly with its most 4.7GHz enhance clock.
Nevertheless, it may very well be that overclocking the Intel Core i7-9700K place will actually achieve a lead over its predecessor. Due to its soldered built-in warmth spreader (IHS), the Intel Core i7-9700K needs to be higher at maintaining the chip cool, permitting for higher overclocks.
In idea, this purported gold-plated solder changing the thermal paste Intel has used before now will likely be a way more environmentally friendly warmth switch medium.
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K: must you improve?
So, must you improve from an Intel Core i7-8700K to an Intel Core i7-9700K? We cannot have the ability to offer you a definitive reply till we have correctly reviewed the brand new chip and frolicked with it, however on paper, at the least, it appears just like the Intel Core i7-9700K is a good improvement for a fairly larger worth.
It does not appear like it does something that can make the Intel Core i7-8700K out of date any time quickly, although. This may be excellent news for Intel Core i7-8700K house owners, however disappointing for others.
Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K
Blender offers us a have a look at rendering efficiency for a tile-based manufacturing 3D rendering workload. That is very totally different from how one thing like Premiere would deal with encoding, so we’d advise not attempting to extrapolate this efficiency to video functions.
For Blender, the 9700K at 5.1GHz finally finishes finishing the GN Monkey Head render in 25 minutes, or the GN Emblem render in 28 minutes. This location is around the inventory 2700 is, however, with considerably larger energy consumption at 16.5A, or about 198W. Overclocking 2700 to 4.2GHz, just like the place a 2700X would land, places it at 23 minutes for the Monkey Heads and 27 minutes for the emblem. That is where Ryzen begins to tug forward and can also be the place the 9900K exhibits its efficiency benefit over the 9700K. The identical is true for the 8700K, which leverages its additional threads on the 6C/12T strategy to steer the 9700K in every take a look at, inventory, and overclocked.
Intel i7-9700K Thermal Benchmarks
Thermals on the Intel i7-9700K are on the display screen now. For auto settings, remember that we closely depend upon the motherboard used because auto voltages most instantly impact the temperature. For the ASUS Maximus XI, these auto settings put the 9700K at 27 levels Celsius over ambient when loaded to 100% with a Blender workload. Understand that that is with MCE disabled, so it’s following the enhanced period specification and sticking to the ability consumption of 90W. Liquid temperature is at around 6 levels over ambient throughout this take a look at go.
Going to about 5GHz and 1.35V, the 9700K measures a mean all-core load of 54 levels over ambient, with energy consumption at 188W and liquid thermals at about 10 levels over ambient. These locations, the 9700K as noticeably cooler than our 9900K pattern when soldered, which measured at 64 levels over ambient. This thermal delta isn’t for every other cause than the 9900K drawing considerably extra energy on this takes a look at. The 2 outcomes usually are not instantly comparable, aside from saying that the 9700K’s lack of hyperthreading does make it simpler to maintain cool below heavier overclocks by drawing much less energy. This isn’t like-for-like comparability, although, provided that energy draw is totally different for each takes a look at. The 8086K can also be indirectly comparable in that its die is a distinct measurement, and so its dissipative properties are totally different than the 9700K and 9900K. That stated it’s nonetheless correct simply concerning evaluating how your temperatures may fluctuate from product to product for functions of cooler choice or upgrades.
Thermally, the 9700K isn’t that onerous to chill below auto situations and maybe saved fairly cool with our X62 280mm cooler below overclocked situations. It does turn into a problem to overclock past 5.1GHz and 1.35V with this cooler, as we’re coming into the 90s for some particular person core temperatures. These hottest cores will prohibit the remainder of the cores.
Conclusion
The Intel i7-9700K drew a lot of flak when it was first announced since it was the first “gaming” S-class i7 in recent memory to ditch hyperthreading. The switch was accompanied by an increase in body core depend to 8C, but it followed the earlier switch from 4C/8T to 6C/12T, making it feel like a weird middle-step that had forgotten the 8700K’s teachings. Fans felt cheated by Intel’s decision; rather than a clear improvement within the product category, Intel had taken a lateral step.
Now that we’ve looked at it, we can see that benchmarks show the 9700K to be consistently superior to the preceding 8700K in gaming tasks, owing to its higher frequency. This isn’t always the case, such as in Blender workloads, when the 8700K’s additional threads come in handy. The price difference between the 9700K and the 8700K is also off-putting. Thus the gaming benefits of the 9700K are overshadowed when considering the price difference. It would be more tenable at the same price, but the increase from $400 to $430 is unacceptable in the face of Intel’s similarly performing i7-8700K at lower prices.
Intel didn’t seem to benefit from the relocation. The 9700K is adequate. It’s not a bad product; it performs admirably in testing (overall), and it wins and loses some checks, just like every other product. The peculiarity is that it is shedding checks in opposition to its predecessor, even when these are simple worth checks rather than efficiency checks. This was also true for graphics cards such as the RTX 2080, where performance was excellent, but the price was a clear step down from previous generations. We have similar feelings about the 9700K. To feel comfortable with the 9700K, we need to see the price drop to approximately the same level as the 8700K — around $350. Even yet, it appears to be a strange lateral transfer from the 8700K before it.
